Armin Arlert (
schachmeister) wrote in
victory_road2021-02-10 04:32 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Video;
[The video opens on a nice little beach towards the sunset hours. A large red Gyarados is laying with his head in the surf, enjoying some good rubs to his crest from Armin, who addresses the camera without taking his eyes off the big lug on the sand.]
I spent a lot of time reading the Pokedex when I first arrived here, but the longer I am here and the more research I do, the more I realise there are a lot of falsehoods in the Pokedex as well. Or at least, a lot of uncorroborated information. Which, unfortunately, seems to lead to some pokemon having a very undeserved reputation.
Take Gyarados, for example.
[He gestures with his arm to the Gyarados laying on the sand, who lets out a low rumble of enjoyment.]
All the Pokedex talks about is how vicious and destructive they are, and how they go on constant rampages.
Now, I won't deny that they can be dangerous and territorial in the wild, but I don't think it is right to portray them as mindless rampaging monsters either. They behave that way for a reason and each has their own personality. They can make perfectly fine pokemon, as long as they are handled by an experienced trainer.
[In fact, Armin got some theories about how their bad reputation really is the result of being handled by a few too many inexperienced trainers.]
I'm not sure how to go about submitting corrections to the Pokedex, but until I figure that out, I wanted to ask: are there any pokemon you care about that you feel have a very undeserved reputation? Or any other false information in the Pokedex that you know about?
[Armin can't research every pokemon as much as he'd like. But perhaps other people can help him correct any misconceptions he might have.]
I spent a lot of time reading the Pokedex when I first arrived here, but the longer I am here and the more research I do, the more I realise there are a lot of falsehoods in the Pokedex as well. Or at least, a lot of uncorroborated information. Which, unfortunately, seems to lead to some pokemon having a very undeserved reputation.
Take Gyarados, for example.
[He gestures with his arm to the Gyarados laying on the sand, who lets out a low rumble of enjoyment.]
All the Pokedex talks about is how vicious and destructive they are, and how they go on constant rampages.
Now, I won't deny that they can be dangerous and territorial in the wild, but I don't think it is right to portray them as mindless rampaging monsters either. They behave that way for a reason and each has their own personality. They can make perfectly fine pokemon, as long as they are handled by an experienced trainer.
[In fact, Armin got some theories about how their bad reputation really is the result of being handled by a few too many inexperienced trainers.]
I'm not sure how to go about submitting corrections to the Pokedex, but until I figure that out, I wanted to ask: are there any pokemon you care about that you feel have a very undeserved reputation? Or any other false information in the Pokedex that you know about?
[Armin can't research every pokemon as much as he'd like. But perhaps other people can help him correct any misconceptions he might have.]
[Video]
[Video]
Re: [Video]
[Video]
no subject
[That seems weird, even for what he's seen of this world so far.]
...you think maybe it's some kind of AI? Like the info is sort of- updating itself?
no subject
And I'm sorry, but... aye-eee? I can't say that I am familiar with that.
no subject
no subject
But admittedly, I come from a world where we did not even have electricity, so I am not necessarily the best judge of these sorts of things.
no subject
[He's probably gonna try just talking to his Gear later.]
no subject
[Completely earnestly, because, well... he does. That exactly the sort of situation they are in in his homeworld.]
There are some other people who are far more familiar with technology who might be able to help you with that. You could try getting into contact with a person called Pidge. She knows a lot about technology.
no subject
[Maybe another former non-human? That doesn't seem like a human name.]
The tech levels here feel a little weird all around, honestly. These communicators, but no cars or anything? At least not that I've seen.
no subject
But again, I'm not the best person to ask about anything technological.